Details

Edité par

ACO DESIGN STUDIO

Vendu par

ACO DESIGN STUDIO

Taille

1.15GB

Disponible depuis

2023-12-22

Version

1.0.2

PID

18594

Description

Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport (IATA: TEP ; ICAO: RCTP) is an international airport located in Dayuan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, about 35 kilometers from downtown Taipei, which is busiest and largest in Taiwan. When it opened on February 26, 1979, it was named Chiang Kai-shek International Airport. In October 2006, its name was changed to the current Taoyuan International Airport. The RCTP is ranked among the top 100 airports in the world by Skytrax in 2023.

Features:
Highly detailed terminal and airport building.
Highly detailed interior of the terminal.
Highly detailed interior of the Waiting Room.
Real airport ground texture.
Excellent night effects.
Static airport ground vehicles.

If you own a GSX Pro product, you can download the GSX Pro for RCTP Profile from here (https://flightsim.to/).(Search: ACO RCTP)

Notes

Ce produit est doté de notre technologie simInstaller et n'est disponible qu'après achat via notre APP

Requis

Microsoft Windows 10
Microsoft Flight Simulator
CPU: Intel i5-8400 or better (AMD Ryzen 5 1500X or better)
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 or better (AMD RX5700 or better )
VRAM: 6GB
RAM: 16GB
2.5GB minimum useable hard disk space

Avis

Total des Avis

5

Name: RCTP TAIWAN TAOYUAN INTL AIRPORT MSFS
Brand: ACO Design Studio
SKU: 18594
Price: 21.99 EUR
Availability: InStock
Rating: 5 (5 reviews)

Note Moyenne

5

5 Etoiles

4 Etoiles

3 Etoiles

2 Etoiles

1 Etoile

2024-02-20

This scenery is great, the airport is well modeled and the details are authentic. I am very pleased with the scenery. I am even more impressed with the developer though, and I am giving it a 5 star rating because of this, the dev has released 2 updated over the past month, within a single day of MSFS being updated which caused terrain conflicts that they fixed within 24 hours. A lot of scenery ends up abandoned by other devs, but not with ACO, these guys are great and really do care about their products. If you like flying in Taiwan, buy this airport, you will not be disappointed!

2024-01-24

Everything you want from a payware airport! Beautifully modelled terminals and airport buildings, great ground textures, functioning Navdata/SIDs/STARs and very well optimized with pretty much no performance degradation. Thank you for a much needed RCTP.

2023-12-24

Very nice and FPS friendly scenery. Finally a good rendition of RCTP.

2023-12-23

While there is plenty of good things to find with this scenery, like nice and careful modelling and texturing in many places, there is some points that leave me disappointed. Pricing an airport at this very high level, it needs to get compared to the best in the business, and there's where it falls short: - Default Asobo jetways have been used. That's a no-go at this price point. - The runway textures/markings do not match the real airport and seem to include many default texture elements. And when you see heavy touchdown tyre marks placed way before the displaced threshold it just feels rushed. - No VDGS included, though they do provide a GSX profile to use. But at this price point people should not pay extra for VDGS. But speaking of GSX: There is such a thing as too many ground support vehicles. Every single gate is completely filled up with static vehicles, leaving virtually no room to realistically place GSX vehicles. - Night textures feel artificial; The ATC tower features bright flood lighting inside at night, which is obviously completely unrealistic. Also, all those buildings without interior modelling are textured with every single window brightly lit up, making the scene appear quite artificial. If you need to fly to Taiwan then this airport can still be recommended to get. But the high price vs. quality just can't compare to many competitors. While things like the main terminal roof modelling are very impressive, other parts feel generic and not thought out well. The premium price should result in a premium scenery, which this, sadly, is not.