Christopher
Ive Watched Three Good Reviews On This Plane , I Brought It , I Installed It And Flew From Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport To Williams Town Military Airport Just Over An Hour And A Half, Up The Australian NSW Coast Line Over Places I Knew Plus Friends Houses, Phoned Them And Told Them To Look Up At Me Waving Madly, I Thought It Might Be A Slug To Fly But To My Surprise It Wasn't. I Had Sooo Much Fun! This Plane Has A Really Short Take Off And Landing [its In The Write Up]- Watch The First Time You Pop The Flaps, A Thing Of Beauty . Magic , All Smiles.
DRZEWIECKI DESIGN - CHICAGO LANDMARKS MSFS
John
Overall, good buy on sale.. i go back and fourth between 3 and 1/2 stars and 4, but since half not an option I'll go 4.
Buildings blend well when in the right position at the right time of day. Otherwise id say they are to bright or white or clean, not sure. The color tonality to me does not match from the photogram scenery. The LUT or LOD is not quite right?? Regardless, there's a difference. Harder to tell in flying low in the loop cause there's more designed buildings. Easier to see along the north shore and from a little altitude. Needs to be more gray, dark, somethin?
Winter does look off like the one reviewer said. unless u have it on the default snow with low clouds and such. it just looks off compared to rest of the scenery if its clear skies and just snow on the ground. But if you just throw on the preset snow weather choice, it looks fine.
All that "bad" stuff i can live with because i appreciate the indefinite draw distance. since there are so many designed buildings, that will be there even when flying in from distance, altitude is much better because you can see a skyline, because the buildings don't have to load in, they are just there. it makes it that much more real.
Then there's night time. which color tones not matching doesn't matter any way because its night and the night lighting albeit a little over the top looks so much better then the default night lighting. That still some what loads in. But can be seen so much further away then the default.
As i said on sale, i think worth it for sure. its goods still out weigh its "bads" And if it was ever updated to match better, then id say 5 stars for sure.
LATINVFR - LATIN HUB CARACAS SVMI FSX FS2004
MR ANSELM J
Very nice scenery package very happy with this scenery package 5stars;)
TAXI2GATE - SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT KSEA FSX P3D
MR ANSELM J
Massive done to the taxi2gate team on yet another fantastic scenery package very happy with this product definitely 5stars for this;) :)
TAXI2GATE - MUNICH AIRPORT EDDM FSX P3D
MR ANSELM J
Wow this scenery package is very highly detailed in every way lots of eye candy even love the night textures aswell I had for many years the aerosoft version of Munich but I have to say a massive well done to the taxi2gate team on there version of Munich airport space is massive and very busy with arriving and
departing aircaft looks so realistic very happy with this scenery package definitely 5 stars if I could I would give 10 stars so again massive well done to the scenery team on a fantastic package very happy ;) :)
AEROSOFT - GERMAN ISLANDS 1: EAST FRISIA XP X-PLANE 11
Nicola
This should have just been Borkum without the other islands, which are mostly unpopulated anyway.
Then Borkum could have been made a lot more detailed and without autogen buildings.
Lig-
hthouses are not lit, helipads have been missed out, and the scenery is just not detailed enough.
VREF SIMULATIONS - KGPI - GLACIER PARK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MSFS
Geoff
This is a reasonably well done airport, but there is nothing about it that would warrant five stars. The textures are not high resolution, there is no interior modelling, nor is the airport a completely accurate rendition (at a minimum, the parking spot numbering at the terminal doesn't match the Jeppesen chart).
Ther-
e are a couple of nice animations of people street side, though the lower resolution texturing doesn't hold up very well at the terminal entrance. Airport side, the tinted terminal window panes reflect nicely, so even though you can't see in, the effect is reasonable. The ramp area is well done, with lots of detritus making the airport feel alive. Parking lots are sufficiently full, but at times the cars themselves are placed a bit haphazardly. The Country Inn is nicely modelled. There are also some jets on the Glacier Jet Center ramp (including a private 757) and there a few light planes parked in front of hangars.
Ove-
rall, this is a mid-tier airport from a quality perspective. Compared to the level of quality airports that Fsdreamteam is producing at this price point, it is hard to argue that this airport is worth the money. On the other hand, this airport certainly comes out on top when compared to the stuff FSXScenery is producing. All of that said, Kalispell may not be high on very many people's lists of "need to have" airports, so the pricing probably assumes a lower volume of sales.
In any case, while this airport is not great, it is good and Kalispell is a beautiful area to fly into. For me it was worth paying a small premium to be able to replace the default airport with something that makes me want to keep flying to that part of Montana.
AMSIM - SHIRAK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT GYUMRI ARMENIA UDSG MSFS
Grigori
Great job, well done!!! Thank you very much!!! Bravo amsim!
SIERRASIM SIMULATION - KSYR SYRACUSE HANCOCK INTL AIRPORT V1.0 MSFS
Taylor
Good looking scenery but not sure if this is a MSFS problem or the scenery but ATC does not recognize runway 28. I select it for departure and I get 33. I select the ILS for 28 and it ignores me basically.
AMSIM - SHIRAK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT GYUMRI ARMENIA UDSG MSFS
Vahe
Love your work, keep on! you make Armenia come to life in MSFS
