Good exterior and interior scenery, but scenery developer is incorrect to state T-Jetways are not supported by Microsoft. Other scenery developers have incorporated such custom jetways into their sceneries.
This is a well-designed scenery. Great interior and exterior detail aligns with its surroundings. I hope SLH Sim Designs considers buidling TJVQ (Vieques, Puerto Rico).
I appreciate the legacy developers porting their sceneries over to MSFS2020, but I would like to see an improvement over what was done in FSX. For a small terminal, I was expecting interior modeling, and the developer did not fully utilize MSFS2020 graphics engine to incorporate things like a flag waving in the wind. If the developer updates with a V2 version, I will gladly purchase it and provide an updated review.
One of the most interior and exterior detailed sceneries for MSFS. Gate 3 jetway is lower relative to other three jetways with an interior downward-sloping ramp access and this was modeled correctly.
I'm updating the 2014-08-23 from three stars to five starts. Taxi2Gate released an update in May 2015 to address the taxiway bridge issue. The fix is located on the taxi2gate.org website under the "Updates" dropdown.
I'm going to agree with others talking about the taxiway bridges. Taxi2Gate really needs to fix this, especially when other developers use taxiway bridges and do not cut off AI traffic as depicted in the AFX/ADE file. They would have almost a flawless scenery if it were not for the taxiway bridges; hence I can't give it five stars until this issue is resolved.