
SIAMFLIGHT - VTBS SUVARNABHUMI AIRPORT THAILAND MSFS
Pretty much impeccable. The night lighting here is immaculate.
Pretty much impeccable. The night lighting here is immaculate.
See full review
I would not recommend anyone to buy this RKSI anymore since I suspect the developers has abandoned the project. Their official site isn't available anymore since the beginning of 2024 and the airport hasn't been updated for a long time. Definitely go for PacSim RKSI for quality and a proper GSX Profile.
See full review
This is a really good rendition of LIRF. The only issue I encountered is just how small the jetways are modeled here. If you use GSX the passengers simply won't fit inside the jetways which is kind of ugly.
See full review
The scenery itself is really well done and it is one of the best airports for MSFS. There will be several major updates coming soon (hopefully). The biggest problem with this is the elevation issues. The entire airport is just flat and built on 35R's altitude. That is not how KDEN is in real life. Autolanding here just won't work well since virtually none of the runways matches published elevation.
See full review
It's not the best flightbeam product ever but Mir did promise future updates for it. Terminal interior's kinda lacking but it is a solid product overall. I would definitely recommend if you fly into MSP frequently.
See full review
You really can't complaint against the price tag but this isn't a top quality payware airport. There's major elevation issues for virtually all runways making autoland practically unusable. Terminal interior and textures are subpar for 2024 standards. It is indeed slightly better than Gaya's version so if you fly into it frequently it's sort of worth it.
See full review
Airport is pretty good overall but there are texture issues and bumps on taxiways and runways. The threshold marking of RWY34L is currently messed up and extremely bumpy. Besides that it's great quality and performance wise.
See full review
I have this and the pacsim rendition of RKSI. Both are great airports but if you want better quality get PacSim and if you want better performance get le Aero.
See full review
Runway is a little too bumpy for a 0.0 gradient. Texture resolution is way too low so you cannot even see the ICAO type markings at the gates. It's flyable but definitely doesn't match the 20-ish dollar price tag.
See full review