Reviews (by vincent)

This is a nice product, not good or great but nice. I also had problems with the install on my old rig, but since I built a new rig and went from p3dv3 to 3.2 the install was a lot easier. I followed the directions like last time and it worked. Not complicated but you have to take time to read and go step by step, this time I installed MTX first and then two addons as of to date. I see the new paints for AA and SWA, very nice. Models are not that great still with this product but no one a'i planes really are. I did WOAI it was nice but since p3dv3 the lights are missing. I went with WOAI so I could use A.I flight planner. I wish MTX had a simple flight editor like Just TrafficX did. For now this will do as P3d is always updating and so will this product, only time will tell. Only 3 stars as models are ok and the not so easy to install only because we like the install to do it all for us

Do not waste your time or money. The interface to create flight plans has not change. If you create flights starting at 0700 then you cannot go past 2330. I made a post on the forum but no answer as to why. Compare to A.I flight Planner which allows you to make flight plans in any time frame as long as you get back in time in which the first flight was due to take off. Also the repaints are still old paint schemes. There are no United merger liverly. Also if 360 is a upgrade then why VTBS airport not in the database. In order to get the database you have to dump airports within FSX. A process that you have to firgure out thru web research. It is not hard but you need to read carefully. I can live without current paint schemes but not having an aiport that was around when FSX was coming out is a shame and not an upgrade. I use A.I flight planner which adding new airports quite easy. For the price you pay and all they did was change the packaging not the software. If your going to pay for A.I traffic go with Mytraffic 5.4b from them and not Mytraffic 2013 from aerosoft...their support is horrible along with MT2013. UT2 is not bad but not total worldwide coverage. After being a Flightsimmer for sometime now I wished I came upon world of Ai and Ai flightplanner long ago. Would of save me a ton of money. Tell us your opinion

I have this product and I like it. I have FSGlobal so it really looks great. I do hope Skysoft will do FSX version. I did import the fs9 version into FSX. It look great except for the Terrain but I did not import the Terrain. I just wanted to see if it woked. The support is not all that great. The site seems to be getting better. I do give him a job well done because he is trying to do airports in a region which is ignored. I do hope he will AES his airports or have moving Jetways for an FSX version to use with GSX or AES. I like that Skysoft and ThaiCreations are doing Asian Airports. I do hope they both will create FSX versions and AES the airports. I give him 4 stars because I hope by now he would have AES the airport for the AES fans. I am looking forward for the ZBAA release and other Chinese airports It looks great in FS9. You will have to add A.I traffic because there is none. One other note AI planes are very high when coming in for a landing and they come down really hard, sometimes they do not land at all. This is something to do with FS9 engine I think. With another of Skysoft add-on that has a high elevation,AI has a hard time landing. In conclusion the airport with FSGlobal for FS9 looks great. A hard approach going thru the mountains but not difficult. No AES support at this time but it does not take away from the airport. You need to add AI for the airport. I do recommend this airport for the Asian flyers! 20 USD is not bad since he has a few freeware airports on his site that are not bad. Hope he has many more to come. One more thing, some of his airports are not in the FMC. So if you use any payware with FMC you will not see some of the airports for the FMC. I hope that NAvigraph will update for those regions. I think that it may be awhile since there is not much info for a lot of China's airports. Hope this helps.

A nice product. The developer has some nice freeware. The night effect however need to be remapped as you cannot see your plane in the dark. The airport is lit but other objects are not lit. I will post a pic in the next review. I am glad someone is making China's airports. I hope he will make his products AES which will make the products more on demand. I give it 3-4 stars. Once the nightlighting is fixed for surrounding objects I will give it 5 stars. Nice product all in all

As to the post before. If you use fs global but fs global higher in the settings. That should work. If not but the add on higher in the settings like number 1 or 2 depending if you have aes as that needs to be at number one. I have not had the texture effects you have. I have fs global 2005 with an I7 pc with 6850 video card. Even with the 5870 card I did not have that problem. Just make sure in the settings scenery libary fs global is higher than the add on. Hopes that helps

I like this airport. Noy much hit fps. I have an I7 pc with 8gb of ram. The textures are dark but very detailed. Not dark enough to cause me not to want the airport. I have no idea what the airport looks like in rel life. Fs9 has so many payware airports that not all textures are made the same. Seems like in FSX the textures are more the same. You can only model textures in which fs9 or fsx is limited to. FS9 came out 2003-2004. Not many machines could handle high end textures when it came out. I recommend this as a great add-on. I hope they do more and the airports get AES as well. The only drawback to this one is the town outside the airport seems very small amd looks like something on a x-mas shirt from long distance as you apporach. Becomes more clear as you get closer. As I said before i do not know what the airport or city looks like. Most designers who have very realistic airports and put the time in try their best to model the airport and surrounding areas. So with that I give the airport 4 stars. Keep up the good work and hope to see more soon.

I notice some of the other posts. I do not have any blurred or bleeding textures. I have a GTX 460. I am using windows 7 54 bit. The airport looks good. I do agree it does need some autogen. I have looked at photos and there are a lot of trees by the airport. I still think it worth the money. If you are ready this if reviews and talk around the FS world is 50/50 then do not buy it especially if there is no support for the product. Hope this is revised for those having problems along with some autogen.

This is a very nice Airport as well as the others made by this company. The only problem no support forum. If you like flying in Asia and wished for more Airports besides Overland Japan Airports of VTBS and VHHX and WSSS. Not many very detailed Airports for Asia that is worth the money. Onet has other Airports AES so hopefully soon this will be as well. Also check out Thai Creation Airports you will not be disappointed I assure you. There was a problem with the installer for this airport but after contacting Simmarket I was able to recieved the download for the new installer. If you are a beginner to fs9 then this is worth the money. 5 stars in my book

Great product. This airport is great along with the other airport they created Hanoi I Hope aerosoft will AES'ed the airports. Great level of detail. Easy framerates. I hope they do a FSX version as well. I am partial to fs9. Too many products that I purchase here to change to FSX. BravoZulu to Thai Creation for their two airports. I hope they do Laos and other SoutEast Asian airports. Keep up the good work.