CHINA-KASHGAR INTL. AIRPORT ZWSH MSFS

Wonderful Scenery. Best rendition of Bremen so far for me, good FPS, good modeling and textures, good details. I can recommend this Add-On.

RDPresets did a good job on this one like their other sceneries. Got EHRD together with the PMDG 737 which is a great combi for many great flights. Great performance and night lighting, highly recommended.

Above Denver Intl and Aspen, dozens of helicopters. It's too dense and random traffic. They are flying like flies. I'm waiting for the patch. Above New York with other traffic in sight addition traffic is perfect.

Love this airport, Great details with very good performance/FPS with my cheap PC. Went to Naples in real life this summer, looks exactly the same, Highly recommend this airport. Got it from the RD website on day 1. 1 word: Bellissimo

Good work, I hope there will be a military airport in the future.

An important airport and the day scenery is great, but a little dissappoited with night lighting of the terminal e.g.the yellowish window looked like painting - hope developer can improve on this aspect.

This scenery needs to be updated majorly. As a former airline employee at KRDU this does not make me feel there at all. "The back yard" is too small, entrance to baggage and canopy to go under between the back yard and front of term 2 is nit there. the ground traffic roadway is too large making gates really short. All gate positions need to be reconsidered. The RON parking is not there on both sides of Terminal 2. Terminal 1 does not at all resemble at the work they did to upgrade. They are building a new runway next to 05L/23R which will the new 05L/23r. There are people walking around in circles in common clothing which does not make sense. Although I could complain about the modeled building for term2 I can actually deal with it. But what kills the immersion for me are the items described above. I am happy I can taxi without destroying the my aircraft with all the bumps from the default scenery.

MSk has great scenery addons for fsx. overall great scenery you get what you pay for. Definitely can improve in some areas like night lighting at the terminal, runway textures and upgrade the jetways from static to moving.

Good modelling, VDGS as well as good performance are strong points of this scenery, unfortunately there are several issues that lower the quality to a point where I just don't think it's a good hub airport scenery: Som-
e issues that are important for a large hub airport: - Complete absence of accurate airline gate assignments and wingspan size for parking spots. AI Airlines and aircraft types park in places where they never do on the real airport. - There is no custom, Heathrow-specif-
ic animated ground vehicle traffic anywhere on the aprons or service roads. - Gross errors in jetway placement: Most jetways lack a realistic looking attachment to the walls. Some of the jetways are not even touching the walls at all, it's especially bad at Terminal 4. And many jetways therefore do not attach to AI aircraft. Strange negligence in quality control for something labelled as "accurate jetway placement" in the features list. It's issues like these that prevent the scenery from delivering a true Heathrow flair. There are further items amiss where the competition has done better: - A few service road tunnel ramps have been modelled while most are represented by flat, non-descending roads only. This is very much noticeable where such tunnels are located next to taxiways. - Some terminal buildings feature interior modelling that is plenty good for such a large hub, great job there. However, on those buildings that do not have such 3D interiors, only low-resolution night lighting textures are present. Unfortunately many daytime building textures are of low resolution as well, and a bit sterile in places, which do get noticed around the parking spots. - In some areas crisp apron ground textures are bordered by very crude low res aerial imagery devoid of any 3D structures, which are again very much noticeable if located right next to taxiways or parking spots. - While it is admirable to see high-res textures on all cars in the parking lots, the LOD for that texture is set so close as to pop up right in front of the aircraft, making the approach to runways 27R/L rather painful. Fewer cars with better LOD texture properties would have been preferable here. - The maintenance area is odd looking with hangars fully open and empty, looking more like huge shelters instead of aircraft hangars. I don't need an endless amount of detail, but here the maintenance area is a true ghost town. So while I see some good effort by ini such as VDGS and good care in placing taxiway signs or lights, the overall quality is not that good I'm afraid, in texture quality, features and accuracy. The lack of accurate airline/wingspa-
n specifications is especially painful in such a place, and there are many competitors that feature custom animated ground service vehicles as standard, both very important items at a hub airport.

It's cool to land Boeings and Airbuses on CATIII autoland, but this plane is much more fun and challenge to fly it! Get yourself a VOR/NDB only flight plan, disable FMC and you won't get bored during the flight. The manual itself is not as big and detailed like on those study level airplanes, but I still needed to study it and get some takeoff/landing training before I could fly this airplane. So it is kind of a study level machine. This is not my first Just Flight plane, I am getting more happy with each new one, so can't wait for them to release Fokker! My conclusion is, that everyone who is passionate about retro aviation, should get this plane, to feel what it was like, to fly a classic jet, as it feels great!