Reviews (by Heikki)

Really nice aircraft especially the upgrades done since fsx, but i would advise in only buying this in a sale rather than full price. at full price it's not value for money.

The difference between this and V.1 is night and day its that good. MK aren't reknown for doing high quality photogreal ground surface nor do they tend to bother to put much in the way of autogen outside the airport, but they have truly outdone themselves this time. In the long run it now gives me the immersion i need when flight simming, coming into and out of GCTS, quality work all round MK, thanks

love this place, good quality airport, but again lack of autogren, lack of high quality photoreal ground imagery and autogen, let it down like so many other of MK airports, they need to really need to begin paying attention to whats next to the airport, we want immersion but we dont get it here, regardless of what fanboi sites say about how great it is. The airport is good quality, but thats not the problem here, its everywhere outside the airport that is.

I think some people who buy this have let it get them carried away. Firstly as renditions go, aside from non airside scenery which was very scarce in UK2000's version, it still had the same scenery as here. The only difference thats been made between the older version for fsx and this version for p3dv4.4 is the resurfacing of the runway to make it compliant with PBR, at night time it feels extremely clunky and choppy and thats with dynamic lights off. I run a high end pc with the latest nvidia graphic's card with a lot of memory so I should be able to plain sail straight through this choppiness but its impossible. Also during the day, even in cloudy conditions the apron and runway look far too metalic, and although day time has no real hit on the fps, the addition of the metalic looking apron / taxiway and runway isnt being realistic. The tarmac is light to dark rain depending on whether. The taxiway / runway signage in sunshine makes it impossible to even read due to the sun bouncing off the sign making it shiny and unable to read. This is my nearest aiport and I fly from here from time to time because its much easier to navigate than Manchester airport, and compared to Gary's version, we've needed and updated remade Liverpool airport, but for me, while it looks aestetic during the day and early evening, it should be far more optimized than it is. At night time its definiately not usable by this reviewer due to massive fps spikes even with dynamic lights off! f this doesnt receive an update pretty soon, I wont have a choice but to revert back to Gary's old tired version which works perfectly, he did mention somewhere he plans to update this airport at some stage because it desperately needs it. 3 stars is for the day time use when the sun isnt blinding me via the road signage

NOTE that FSDG is the creator of this airport and not Aersooft. Aerosoft are the publisher's of this airport.

Beautifully challenging airport, complete with the city of NUUK. Only try to bring in a B738 in very good weather with clear visibility, which is not often in real life with this airport. Best suited to small single or twin engine aircraft types up say a DHD8. The runway is challening and so is the weather and scenery. This is one of the more challenging airports / dangerous in the world.Cold weather flying at its best.