TENERIFE NORTE - LOS RODEOS - GCXO MSFS

All the taxiways and taxiway signs are incorrect. Too many misplaced taxiways lights as well.

Poorly done FSX conversion. Textures, lighting, buildings not really standard level for payware. Not even a Tower-View has been configured. At least SAM integration, Marshallers (at the cargo stands) and Ortho compatibility. 2 Stars

It's just ok. The real RV 8 is known for it's speed and rate of climb. This one has a cruise speed of only 105 knots and the climb way is too sluggish.

Excellent rendition of VTBS. Amazing & accurate detail, plus they continue to keep it updated. I look forward to more Thai and ASEAN airports from this developer.

amazing payware, graphics/sound/-
fps all great plus you get 2 wingmen to follow you on flights that don't affect your fps...incredibl-
e, thank u devs :)

FSCGAA did a great job in creating the new Ulaan Baatar airport (ZMCK) for P3D V4/V5. The textures are high quality, and the performance (FPS) is great too. I can recommend this scenery to everyone, who wants to fly to the capital of Mongolia, with a beautiful asian countryside!

Handles good but the performance is not as good as in the real one. Cruise speed and climb rate seem pretty low.

Any work deserves respect, but I would give an average rating, maybe even lower. I'm sure the author could have done better if he'd put in more effort. The biggest drawback is the incorrect operation of the ILS on both runways. This is a glaring shortcoming and it is desirable to correct it.

Excellent work! Guys, if possible, please make a custom differents in thresholds for more realism

The airport features nice modelling for buildings in a good amount of detail and using crisp textures. What I do not like is the fact that the paved ground textures (apron and runway) are not at all life-like, too clean and perfect. Adding to that are the ground markings which are also too clean and sterile looking with a cartoonish looking contrast. So the quality of the ground textures does not match the good quality for the buildings. A-
nother drawback is the lack of aviation-relate-
d attention to detail: - Windsocks are missing - Localiser antenna is missing (visible as blurry part of the aerial imagery) - A generic model has been placed where the VOR station is located, however it is not the model of a VOR station - Wrong type of approach lighting - PAPI lights do not match the position of the lights visible on the aerial imagery So overall this is a good effort on the part of the buildings, but lacking in ground textures, markings and aviation related details.