Reviews (by Peter)

VR user review: Excellent aircraft to fly. I love being able to put on different tanks and scoot around for short flights. Thanks to the analogue gauges and the developers, this is the most FPS friendly aircraft I use, making it an absolute joy to fly with. Some people have had control problems - but I think this is more the case of the flight dynamics of MSFS rather than the devs. You learn to get around it. As a flight experience, the engine is nice to control, and the aircraft is enjoyable to trim. Cheers!

To the guy above, although you say that most military jets consume their fuel in 10 minutes with afterburner, the F-111 is different. It was designed for long range. Although I do agree that the rate in which fuel decreases with dump & burn is way too slow, that is meant to be faster. You can also find some updates to this plane at F111-fsx.com On the other hand, it is worth noting that the texturing, animations and effects are beautiful and some of the best I have seen in FSX. This is where it truly shines. However, there is not functionality with the WSO and only basic radios(I believe). So I am gonna put this down: JF F-111 vs. GKS F-111 Pro-GKS texturing and modelling is better. Pro-GKS Sound is better. Pro-GKS afterburner is better. Pro-Flight dynamics in GKS is more agile than the F-111 by JF. JF feels too heavy. Pro-There is a glitch in the JF F-111 where if you accelerate to 700 knots ground level, you can then push it to 1200 its, and suddenly you have no fuel.( I know that 1200KTS is overspeed) Pro-There a many more liveries in the GKS version, and they are more colourful, but JF ones are quite similar, just different markings. Con-Radio station in GKS does not work, but JF does. Con-Generally there is less functionality in this than the JF version. Con-It is easier to add fuel tanks and bombs onto JF F-111. COn-Fuel consumption is weird. Con-Dump & Burn fuel consumption is way too low. Con-JF F-111 is cheaper. Hope this sums up enough. Pete