Reviews (by Mabrouki)

FSDG remarkably misses the opportunity to outperform its payware competition with this rendition, especially considering the competing Casablanca scenery dates back to very early MSFS2020 days. While the main passenger terminals, VIP terminal, and the Royal Air Maroc maintenance hangar are modelled with slightly more detail, this is where the praise largely ends. Even the RAM hangar includes long-retired aircraft types such as the 747-200 and 737 Classics, which immediately undermines realism. Five years after the first payware Casablanca release, FSDG still fails to surpass an increasingly dated product. Overall texturing is uninspiring and often poor, with ground textures standing out as particularly weak and inaccurate. The terminals lack custom jetways, something the competing scenery already offered in 2020, forcing reliance on GSX, which requires additional setup before each flight. Some of the gates miss jetways or the jetways are completely misplaced. It goes without saying that there is no GSX custom profile. Parking positions are improperly labelled, leading to erratic AI traffic behaviour. Cargo and remote apron areas are sparsely detailed and contain numerous inaccuracies... While two future high-speed taxiways are included, they do little to offset the current shortcomings. Overall, this scenery does not justify its $17 price tag, especially for users who already own the competing payware version.

This is simply one of the most immersive North African airport sceneries I've ever seen. Nice little details and outstanding texturing that makes you feel like you're there. I hope to see more CAT3DUAL products in the region

This product was released early in the MSFS 2020 launch and has received few updates since. While the terminals are great and performance is generally excellent, it’s clear that some important updates are long overdue. A key update, for example, would be the addition of the high-speed taxiways that have been in place IRL for nearly three years now. Other minor improvements, such as enhanced taxiway signage and updated texturing, would also have been welcome additions (some would argue that some texturing looks from the FSX era, but the reality is that some buildings at GMMN look like FSX-era like texturing in IRL...)

First of all, the approach into Zagora is absolutely breathtaking. If you want to truly experience flying over the desert, this is the place to go. For those using Navigraph, please note that charts for Zagora aren't available there. However, you can find the necessary charts on the SIA-Maroc website (https://siamaroc.onda.ma/eAIP/AD/index.htm). The scenery is well-modeled, though some buildings and objects appear oversized (the control tower and the red and white sidewalk blocks seem larger than I recall seeing in real life). The terminal building is nicely done, and overall, I believe this scenery is worth 10 euros. I look forward to seeing more FSDG products in Morocco. As of this writing, GSX does not work at this airport (hence the 4 stars).

This is bare-bones freeware quality. While the terminal and tower buildings are somewhat accurate, other structures and library objects seem to be a product of the developer's imagination rather than based on real-life references. Additionally, the stands are notably inaccurate, as TNG features a 45-degree pull-in parking spot style that isn't represented here. There are also no custom ground markings. It's disappointing, especially considering the significance of TNG as a major Moroccan airport. Overall, this add-on isn't recommended.

Great scenery! It would be complete if custom taxiway and runway markings were added in a future update. Hoping to see more Moroccan airports in the future from this developer.

I was initially very skeptical about getting this, but I'm really glad I did. The weather injection feels much more authentic and immersive, rather than just a lifeless METAR representation. The interpolation works exceptionally well, filling in weather data for areas with few or no weather stations—no more CAVOK for your transoceanic flights! The difference is quite noticeable. I forgot to turn the software on once, and I immediately felt the absence of realistic weather.

This version of GMMX beats the scenery made by another developer. The buildings are nicely modelled, the ground textures are decent and the parking layout is accurate (no more wanky AI taxiing or GSX issues).

Impressive rendition, accurate textures, and an overall good job. I owned the P3D version and I loved it. HOWEVER, the FPS performance is... subpar. I understand the Vancouver area is highly modeled and I'm okay losing some performance for that, but it is getting to a point I can't fly the aircraft. It's also very random. I once got decent performance (20-30 FPS) on an approach on a rainy and overcast day and I got null FPS on an approach on a CAVOK day... On an LAX-YVR run, I get better performance in LAX using a third-party scenery, AI traffic, etc...than Vancouver, and that's not acceptable.

Bought it through their website, and used their products since FS2004. I would like to say that I’m very pleased. It feels very nice hand flying it, the turbochargers actually work, the sounds are deafening and immersive. Texture wise Flysimware stepped up and offered a pretty beautiful airframe and cabin. Adding the GTN750 third party addons makes this machine perfect for any mission. The systems are accurate, from fuel control to the pressurization system! I highly recommend it, and I’m glad to see Flysimware in MSFS!

Nicely done, glad to see more African airports being made

Glad to see a GMTT scenery for FSX/P3D! Fairly accurate, no ground polygons so expect default runway and taxiway textures. Buildings are an improvement from the default ones but nothing mindblowing, with a few details and signs, misplaced. The tower feels a bit taller than the real thing but no biggie. What bothers me the most is the use of library objects, making it look too "freeware". For example, for the fencing around the field, the author used standard road cement blocks, which looks really ugly and unrealistic. Up to this point I would have given 4 stars, however, the product/value ratio is a bit off. For fifteen euros I would have expected a little more...